Gather the data: To understand the deficiencies in InDebted's operations, I needed to grasp how the product functions accurately. To ensure I gained an accurate picture of the business, I organised meetings with key areas, including CS Agents, Client Managers, and the executive team of InDebted.
What we discovered: Although some aspects of the business developed industry firsts in automation for payments, there were huge areas in customer and client services that still had manual process with some requiring engineering effort:
• For each enterprise customer they onboarded, it required on average 12 customer service agent to service a clients account costing about $120k.
•Customer data scattered across 3 places, requiring customer service agents excess amount of time to resolve customer and client quires.
• Unclear balances necessitate manual account calculation by customer service.
•Current CRM can't manually alter accounts, hampering US customer service a day as they relied on Australian operations team.
•Engineering and data teams were needed for frequent bulk debtor account exports for clients auditing each week.
• Current client and customer servicing software cost over 1.5 million US per year.
•There were multiple debtor profiles and status, which made it hard to manage an customer account.
Assessment of existing services: I created a user flow to capture how customer and client services operated. This step was critical for evaluating the design and scoping the project, as it pinpointed where breaks occurred and opportunities for improvement arose. My recommendation was we need 3 systems:
• Update the existing user experience within the current CRM to streamline customer escalations and reduce query servicing time.
•Create a client admin portal, to give client service managers functionality removing engineering effort to solve critical issues.
•Clint portal for medium enterprise customers to be able to self prevision their accounts, reducing the need to hire agents to service the account.